<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Christian Civility &#187; Christian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christiancivility.com/tag/christian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christiancivility.com</link>
	<description>Christian Civility in an Uncivil World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:32:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mormonism and Christianity:What Is the Difference?</title>
		<link>http://www.christiancivility.com/say-something-nice/mormonism-and-christianitywhat-is-the-difference/</link>
		<comments>http://www.christiancivility.com/say-something-nice/mormonism-and-christianitywhat-is-the-difference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 08:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Say Something Nice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mormon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christiancivility.com/?p=527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’m inclined to accept Mitt Romney and Jon Huntsman’s word when they call themselves Christian.
 Having said that, let me go on to say that I will not vote for or against either one because he is a Mormon.  I will base my vote on a judgment of their views, whether those views will be good for our country.
No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center">E. Glenn Hinson</p>
<p>            The candidacy of Mitt Romney and, to a lesser extent, Jon Huntsman has aroused intense concern among conservative Christians.  Robert Jeffress, pastor of the First Baptist Church, Dallas, has declared Mormonism a “cult,” meaning thereby to distinguish the Mormon faith of these two candidates from Christianity.  By virtue of his negative assessment of Mormonism, he vigorously espouses the selection of Rick Perry as the Republican candidate.  Were the Republican Party to choose Romney, he would support him, though reluctantly.</p>
<p>            Because a surprising number of friends have written to ask me about this issue, I have had to think about it more seriously than I have ever had to do previously.  What the question forces us to do is to ask a prior question:  How do we define Christianity?  What does it take to be a Christian?</p>
<p>            A run through Christian history will show that Christians have not found it easy to answer those questions.  For the very first Christians the answer was: Belief that Jesus is Israel’s Messiah (Christ).  Very soon, though, they said, “No.  That’s not enough.  We must say, ‘Jesus is Lord,’ one with God.”  By the middle of the second century churches framed baptismal confessions requiring commitment to God as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, as in the Roman Symbol that evolved into the Apostles’ Creed.  By the fourth century, trying to frame more precise definitions, councils of bishops formulated the Nicene and later Creeds with their emphasis upon the Son and Spirit being “of the same essence” as the Father.</p>
<p>            Search for Christian identity did not stop there either.  Eastern Christians recognize seven ecumenical or universal councils (up to 787) as definitive of Christian faith.  The Roman Catholic Church looks to 21 such councils up to and including the Second Vatican Council (1962-65).  Both Orthodox and Roman Catholics rely on tradition.  In the 16<sup>th</sup> century, of course, Protestants negated those definitions and insisted on the Bible alone as offering a guide to who is or is not Christian.  Some, including Baptists, carried this principle to its logical extreme as a non-creedal people.  Since 1925, however, Southern Baptists have reversed themselves on this position and in 2000 published a <em>Baptist Faith and Message</em> that set belief in inerrancy of the Bible as the <em>sine qua non</em> for adherence to Christianity as they understood it.</p>
<p>            I suspect that Mormons can locate themselves comfortably across that broad spectrum.  Yet some might say, “It’s not that they don’t subscribe to some Christian affirmations.  It’s what they <em>add</em> to them that puts them in the ‘cult’ category, notably their use of <em>The Book of Mormon</em> as an authoritative revelation.  They once practiced polygamy based on that (although they had Old Testament support for it also).”   I think there is a certain legitimacy to this concern if Mormons look to <em>The Book of Mormon</em> as their <em>ultimate</em> authority, standing <em>above</em> scriptures as the <em>final</em> definer of their views.  But what if they look to it <em>alongside</em> scriptures like Roman Catholics and Orthodox look to tradition?  They certainly face a stern challenge in defining what being Christian means, but what Christian group does not, whether Catholic, Orthodox, or Protestant?  I’m inclined to accept Mitt Romney and Jon Huntsman’s word when they call themselves Christian.</p>
<p>            Having said that, let me go on to say that I will not vote for or against either one because he is a Mormon.  I will base my vote on a judgment of their views, whether those views will be good for our country.  Our U. S. Constitution negates any religious test for public office.  On that basis, I didn’t need to decide whether Mormonism is Christian.</p>
<div>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Dr. Hinson is Senior Professor of Church History and Spirituality</strong></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Dr. Hinson was the featured speaker for the John A. Hamrick Lectureship at First Baptist Church of Charleston, SC in 2002.</strong></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: #000000;">B. A., Washington University<br />
</span><span style="color: #000000;">B. D. and Th.D., The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary<br />
</span></span></span><span style="font-family: Verdana; color: #000000; font-size: x-small;">D. Phil., Oxford University<br />
</span><span style="font-family: Verdana; color: #000000; font-size: x-small;">Additional research has been done at the Gregorianum in Rome and The Ecumenical Institute for Advanced Studies in Jerusalem.</span></p>
</div>
<div><span style="font-family: Verdana;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: #000000;">Dr. Hinson retired in 1999 from</span> </span></span><span style="font-family: Verdana; color: #000000; font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Verdana; color: #000000; font-size: x-small;">a position of Professor of Spirituality and John F. Loftis Professor of Church History at Baptist Theological Seminary in Richmond, Virginia. He previously taught for more than thirty years at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky. In retirement he is servies as Visiting Professor at Lexington Theological Seminary and Louisville (Presbyterian) Seminary as well as Baptist Seminary of Kentucky.</span></span>Dr. Hinson has given guest lectures at over thirty institutions, including Wales and England. He has authored numerous books, articles, essays and reviews. With an emphasis on ecumenical relationships Dr. Hinson has membership in significant ecumenical organizations and participated in various dialogues. Among his honors is the Cuthbert Allen Memorial Award for Ecumenism, the Ecumenical Institute of Belmont Abbey/Wake Forest University.</p>
</div>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.christiancivility.com/say-something-nice/mormonism-and-christianitywhat-is-the-difference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Danger of a Divided House</title>
		<link>http://www.christiancivility.com/say-something-nice/the-danger-of-a-divided-house/</link>
		<comments>http://www.christiancivility.com/say-something-nice/the-danger-of-a-divided-house/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 20:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Say Something Nice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hateful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christiancivility.com/?p=431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["We can use this moment of crisis to demonstrate how dangerous hateful speech is. Words can hurt, or we can use words to lift us to a new plane. Christian people ought to lead the way." Raphael G. Warmock

lead the way.


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tuesday, August 2, 2011 The Chautauquan Daily Page 13</p>
<p>R e l i g i o n by Mary Lee Talbot</p>
<p>“Jesus, the lowly field preacher, without portfolio or parish, was busy turning the world upside down. The Kingdom of God was at hand. The kingdom of love and justice was at hand. Even though we read from Matthew today, in Luke, Jesus laid out his agenda,” the Rev. Raphael G. Warnock said at the 9:15 a.m. morning worship service Monday. “The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, to preach the good news to the poor.”</p>
<p>Warnock quoted Luke 4:18-19 and then said, “Jesus wason the move.”His sermon title was “The Danger of a Divided House,” and the Scripture was Matthew 12:22-29. “What better evidence was there than they brought a demoniac who was blind and mute, and he cured him?” Warnock said. “Jesus was on the move. That is what people of faith ought to do. How can you love God, whom you have not seen, and not love your neighbor? Jesus was on the move.” Warnock told the congregation that people of faith should give a voice to the mute, evangelize those without faith, give a challenge to the unconcerned, educate the uneducated, strengthen the weak, give courage to the discouraged and hold up the depressed.</p>
<p>“We must embrace the poor until they can feel God holding them,” Warnock said. “People of faith are called to be on the move. Jesus cured the man so he could see and so he could be heard. Jesus gives voice to the voiceless and sight to the blind, and the crowds were amazed.” He continued, “Others were mad. Preachers, be careful how you receive plaudits, because your preaching should make someone mad. Those who were mad had to make achoice. Jesus was a threat to the status quo, a threat to the religious powers. The least, the lost and the left out were being lifted up. Wherever Jesus shows up, we have to make a choice.” The ones who were angry sought to discredit Jesus’ methods and motives. They said that Beelzebub, the prince of demons, gave Jesus his power to cast out demons. “Jesus hears them, and Jesus was a ‘bad brother,’” Warnock said. “You know what I mean; he was so bad that even in their criticism, they could not deny the effectiveness of his methods and ministry. He really is who he says he is. He restricted their power, he evicted the demons and he convicted the crowd. “Jesus responds to the critics, via the Warnock International Version of the Bible, ‘Come on, man, you know what you are saying doesn’t make sense. Why would a demon cast out demon?’ He destroys their agenda. It is a simple, sublime principle — no hou e divided against itself can stand. I liftthis up now because in America today, there are forces that seek to divide us in order to control us. We are in a fight for our lives to keep the house from coming down.” He continued, “Division is our greatest threat today.Abraham Lincoln recognized that a house divided could not stand. We are caught up in an uncivil war of words that demonize and divide. Our motto is ‘E Pluribus Unum’ — out of many, one. The debt ceiling may be settled, but we should not forget that this crisis did not begin six weeks ago or six months ago. We need to grab hold of the best of America. “In 2008, regardless if you are an Independent, Republican or Democrat, we did the unthinkable (in electing Barack Obama as president). We are hearing things aimed at the American president. I rise not to defend him, for he does notneed defending, but I rise to speak to the best of our American conscious. We are using code words in public. ‘He says he is a Christian, but he is not a Christian; he is a Muslim’ — as if that was the worst thing he could be. ‘He says he is an American, but he was not born in America.’ ‘He has aKenyan, anti-colonialist world view’ as if there was a stigma to being African. “Jesus was an anti-colonialist; I am an anti-colonialist, anti-imperialist, anti-phobias person. Jesus came to preach the good news. How can we stand unless we stand together? The issue is who will raise the conversation to a new moral and ethical level. We are a special people in a special place, and we all have to stand together, or the Liberty Bell will always have an unsightly crack.” He continued, ‘Thomas Jefferson was one of the sparks of our special union. He wrote about the inalienable rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of  happiness. As eloquent as he was, he had slaves. But I don’t  mind, because in three weeks, you will look across (the Tidal Basin), and across from Thomas Jefferson will be a black man. Martin Luther King will be there asking, ‘Did you mean what you said when you said it?’ Martin Luther King called us to the best in the American spirit. Patrick Henry said, ‘Give me liberty or give me death.’ The slaves spoke up and said, ‘Me, too.’ Then the women said, ‘Me, too,’ through the suffrage movement. “Christians learned about Christian freedom and Muslims,Jews, Hindus and others said, ‘Me, too.’ We must stand with them. If we stand together in the house of prayer on Sunday, we can’t fight each other on Monday. If you burna Quran this week, next week you will burn a cross in my yard. Gays and lesbians are saying, ‘Me, too. We belong in the house.’</p>
<p>“We can use this moment of crisis to demonstrate how dangerous hateful speech is. Words can hurt, or we can use  words to lift us to a new plane. Christian people ought to lead the way. “And finally,” he said, and the congregation laughed as hereferenced a joke from the Sunday sermon. He reminded the congregation that geese fly in a V formation. “They have figured out the laws of aviation and aerodynamics. Pelicans flap their wings more, but they fly less distance because they fly alone. The goose that works thehardest is the one out front. When it gets tired, it movesback and another moves up. They change positions without a church vote, a split or dissension. They move and keep flying because the individual location is not as important asthe collective destination. We ought to have as much sense as geese.”He concluded, “We are not going to go unless we go together. We have to fly together, walk together, cry together,pray together and struggle together. If we rise and fly together, we will make it to the promised land.”</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.christiancivility.com/say-something-nice/the-danger-of-a-divided-house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Real Culprits for Society&#8217;s Harsh Rhetoric</title>
		<link>http://www.christiancivility.com/authorscarnell-dyck-dowdy-lake-junaluski-conference-center/367/</link>
		<comments>http://www.christiancivility.com/authorscarnell-dyck-dowdy-lake-junaluski-conference-center/367/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Say Something Nice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhetoric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christiancivility.com/?p=367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is not the other person or group that is responsible for the harsh rhetoric in our society. It is each one of us who either contributes to the noise or fails to confront it.
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.christiancivility.com/authorscarnell-dyck-dowdy-lake-junaluski-conference-center/the-real-culprits-responsible-for-societys-harsh-language/' rel='bookmark' title='The Real Culprits Responsible for Society&#8217;s Harsh Language'>The Real Culprits Responsible for Society&#8217;s Harsh Language</a> <small>It is not the other person who is responsible for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.christiancivility.com/say-something-nice/can-the-center-hold-aganist-rise-of-enraging-rhetoric/' rel='bookmark' title='Can the center hold aganist rise of enraging rhetoric?'>Can the center hold aganist rise of enraging rhetoric?</a> <small>Words matter. "If we are to survive as a society...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="50%"><strong>The Real Culprits for Society&#8217;s Harsh Rhetoric</strong>By: Mitch Carnell<br />
Posted: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 6:33 am<br />
Section: <a href="http://www.ethicsdaily.com/section/ethicsdaily-coms-latest-articles">EthicsDaily.com&#8217;s Latest Articles</a></td>
<td width="25%"><a href="javascript:void%200;">Email</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ethicsdaily.com/the-real-culprits-for-societys-harsh-rhetoric-cms-17671-printer">Print</a></td>
<td width="230"> <a href="http://www.ufcwaction.org/site/PageServer?pagename=April4thStandUp" target="_blank"></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">
<table style="width: 498px; height: 2003px;" border="0" cellspacing="5" cellpadding="0" width="498">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="1" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<table border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.ethicsdaily.com/the-real-culprits-for-societys-harsh-rhetoric-cms-17671"></a> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The cashier and I were concluding our discussion about the &#8220;Say Something Nice&#8221; button I was wearing when I handed one to the man who had just walked up.&#8221;Fat chance,&#8221; he said looking at the button. &#8220;Those guys in Washington set a bad example.&#8221;</p>
<p>Back at home, I clicked on the national news in time to hear Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) say, &#8220;I like the president personally. He is a deliberate man and that is what we need at this time.&#8221; He then said he felt the president should act more boldly in Libya, but he expressed his differences with the president in very civil terms. </p>
<p>Most of us would prefer to believe it&#8217;s those other guys – Congress, the far right, the far left, the lunatic fringe, the Tea Party – who are responsible for the angry rhetoric that fills the airwaves. The truth is that the professional merchants of hate and disrespect can only exist where there is a market for their product. Our silence in the face of outrageous disrespect gives permission for their rants. </p>
<p>Over and over again, those of us who promote a more civil discourse are accused of trying to stifle debate or, worse, represent a particular political faction. The truth is that we are promoting the behavior represented by Graham&#8217;s example. Of course, Graham has paid a price for his bipartisan efforts. He has been censored by several Republican groups at home for trying to get along with the opposition. </p>
<p>Our democracy depends on lively, informed, healthy political debate. No American wants a society where nothing is challenged and everything goes. Debate is the life&#8217;s blood of our way of life. If you have a better idea, put it on the table and let&#8217;s see if it can stand up to rigorous scrutiny. </p>
<p>It is not the other group or the other person who is responsible for gutter language in our national debate, or for the shameless and often baseless attacks on individuals. It is any of us who engage in such tactics or fail to challenge them when and where we encounter them. </p>
<p>Years ago my father told me a wonderful story. At a meeting, the featured male speaker looked over the crowd and said, &#8220;Since I see that there are no women present, I have a great story to tell you.&#8221; At this point a man seated near the back of the room rose to his feet and responded, &#8220;No, there are no ladies present, but there are lots of very fine gentlemen here.&#8221; The speaker got the message.</p>
<p> Such a reaction requires courage on our part. When I was a relatively new member at First Baptist Church of Charleston, S.C., years ago, the minister of education asked me to discuss censorship during an educational program. My remarks were later published in the church newsletter.</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0" width="75%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>EthicsDaily.com&#8217;s Featured Resource</strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="100%" valign="top"><a href="http://www.ethicsdaily.com/mod/ecs/index.php?ViewProduct=7"><br />
Beneath the Skin: Baptists and Racism (Individual Copy)</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<p>I said then and I believe today, &#8220;There is nothing that a Christian should not be allowed to read, but much that he or she should choose not to read.&#8221; Today I would add &#8220;or listen to.&#8221; Our abilities to hear and to speak are gifts from God. They are sacred trusts. We are to use them for the betterment of our fellow human beings, not to destroy them. As it says in Ephesians 4:12, &#8220;Let no evil talk come out of your mouths, but only what is useful for building up, as there is need, so that your words may give grace to those who hear.&#8221; </p>
<p>Sally Dyck, Methodist bishop of Minnesota, has done much work on &#8220;holy conferencing.&#8221; One premise: Get the other person&#8217;s agreement that we have understood what he or she said before we add to the discussion. It may slow the discussion, but it will also ensure that our remarks stay on target. </p>
<p>In &#8220;Balanced Living: Don&#8217;t Let Your Strengths Become Your Weaknesses,&#8221; author Monty Knight, a pastoral counselor, states, &#8220;We do not have to go to every fight to which we are invited.&#8221; My late wife stated it in her own fashion when she admonished me, &#8220;Don&#8217;t feed the tigers.&#8221; In other words, don&#8217;t take the bait. </p>
<p>Our words have consequences. As followers of Christ, we have an added responsibility to make certain that our words or our communicative behaviors are consistent with building up the kingdom. </p>
<p><a href="mailto:mitchcarnell@bellsouth.net?subject=via%20EthicsDaily.com"><em>Mitch Carnell</em></a><em> is a communication consultant who works with all types of organizations, including churches. He is the editor of &#8220;Christian Civility in an Uncivil World.&#8221; He is a member of First Baptist Church of Charleston, S.C., and blogs at </em><a href="http://www.mitchcarnell.com/"><em>www.mitchcarnell.com</em></a><em>.</em></td>
<td width="25%" valign="top"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Related Articles</span></strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.ethicsdaily.com/u-n-marks-first-annual-interfaith-harmony-week-cms-17395">U.N. Marks First Annual Interfaith Harmony Week</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.ethicsdaily.com/like-congress-maybe-its-time-we-all-sit-together-cms-17377">Like Congress, Maybe It&#8217;s Time We All Sit Together</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.ethicsdaily.com/poll-americans-of-all-faiths-see-a-civility-problem-in-u-s-politics-cms-17311">Poll: Americans of All Faiths See a Civility Problem in U.S. Politics</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.ethicsdaily.com/four-kinds-of-speech-that-promote-civil-society-cms-17302">Four Kinds of Speech that Promote Civil Society</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.ethicsdaily.com/clergy-urge-congress-to-unite-behind-push-for-civility-cms-17298">Clergy Urge Congress to Unite Behind Push for Civility</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.ethicsdaily.com/reckless-words-often-lead-to-disaster-cms-17290">Reckless Words Often Lead to Disaster</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.ethicsdaily.com/civility-project-disbands-after-low-interest-in-congress-cms-17286">Civility Project Disbands after Low Interest in Congress</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.ethicsdaily.com/lawmaker-asks-clergy-to-foster-tolerance-in-wake-of-shootings-cms-17287">Lawmaker Asks Clergy to Foster Tolerance in Wake of Shootings</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.ethicsdaily.com/learning-to-live-in-a-world-without-privacy-cms-16991">Learning to Live in a World Without Privacy</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.ethicsdaily.com/baptists-voices-of-reason-or-bitter-rhetoric-cms-16797">Baptists – Voices of Reason or Bitter Rhetoric?</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.ethicsdaily.com/keyword/Mitch-Carnell%2C-Civility%2C-Speech">View All</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.christiancivility.com/authorscarnell-dyck-dowdy-lake-junaluski-conference-center/the-real-culprits-responsible-for-societys-harsh-language/' rel='bookmark' title='The Real Culprits Responsible for Society&#8217;s Harsh Language'>The Real Culprits Responsible for Society&#8217;s Harsh Language</a> <small>It is not the other person who is responsible for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.christiancivility.com/say-something-nice/can-the-center-hold-aganist-rise-of-enraging-rhetoric/' rel='bookmark' title='Can the center hold aganist rise of enraging rhetoric?'>Can the center hold aganist rise of enraging rhetoric?</a> <small>Words matter. "If we are to survive as a society...</small></li>
</ol></p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.christiancivility.com/authorscarnell-dyck-dowdy-lake-junaluski-conference-center/367/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Did You Write Christian Civility?</title>
		<link>http://www.christiancivility.com/uncategorized/why-did-you-write-christian-civility/</link>
		<comments>http://www.christiancivility.com/uncategorized/why-did-you-write-christian-civility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[author]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christiancivility.com/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smythe&#38;Helwys, the publisher of Christian Civility in an Uncivil World, sent me a list of questions that they thought you would like to know the answers to. I gace each question a lot of thought. In most cases my answers could have been much longer. Here goes. 1. How would you describe your calling and [...]
No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smythe&amp;Helwys, the publisher of <em>Christian Civility in an Uncivil World</em>, sent me a list of questions that they thought you would like to know the answers to. I gace each question a lot of thought. In most cases my answers could have been much longer. Here goes.</p>
<p>1. How would you describe your calling and mission as a writer and as a Christian?</p>
<p>            My calling as a Christian is to live a life that reflects my faith in Jesus and that causes others to want to share in that faith. My calling and mission as a Christian writer is to communicate the love of God and the blessings of being a member of His family to everyone I can in the simplest and most loving way possible. I want to encourage and help others to share their faith and convictions in ways that glorify God and honors fellow Christians. </p>
<p>2. Which books have had the greatest impact on your ministry?</p>
<p>            It would be difficult to name all of the books that have influenced my life. Other than the Bible, five that have had great influence on me are: <em>As a Man Thinketh</em> by James Allen, <em>Communicating for Life</em> by Quentin Schultze, Uncommon Decency by Richard Mouw, <em>Words That Hurt, Words That Heal</em> by Rabbi Joseph Telushkin and <em>The Power of Positive Thinking.</em> by Norman Vincent Peale.<br />
3. How important do you feel writing is in the world of religion?</p>
<p>            Writing is important for many reasons. Many people are drawn to reading who would not listen to a sermon. Many are drawn to reading for inspiration, encouragement, comfort and entertainment. Others are seeking explanations, information, clarification or guidance. There must be a variety of resources available and at varying levels for all of these seekers. Books and articles can be read and digested when there are small tidbits of time available or while waiting for other things to happen. The Internet opens a great venue for both writers and readers.</p>
<p>4. When did you first become interested in writing?</p>
<p>            I became interested in writing in the sixth grade when our teacher introduced us to poetry and then had us practice writing poems of our own. After initially dismissing the idea, I experienced some success and was hooked. My first paid story was published when I was in the eighth grade.</p>
<p>5. What are the great joys in writing for you?</p>
<p>            The great joy in writing for me is when I receive a note or telephone call from someone who tells me that a particular piece has helped him or her in some way. After I wrote about the death of my first wife, a woman called to say that she had posted the article on her refrigerator so she could read it often and that it had helped her re-engage life after a difficult and traumatic situation. </p>
<p>6. What events led up to you writing <em>Christian Civility in an Uncivil World</em>?</p>
<p>            Christian Civility in an Uncivil World, grew out of my deep concern about the direction rhetoric is taking in our society and especially the way many denominations, churches and individuals are treating one another. Some groups are taking out full page newspaper advertisements denouncing and demonizing other Christian organizations. My experiences at the Chautauqua Institution in New York State and with the John Hamrick Lectures at First Baptist Church of Charleston, SC let me experience that people of different backgrounds, experiences, and faith traditions could engage in civil discourse without rancor. Because of my background in the field of communication, I felt a deep calling to use whatever knowledge, skills and abilities I have to help Christians of all backgrounds find a way to communicate with and about each other and with non-Christians in a way that would glorify God.<br />
7. How do you feel <em>Christian Civility in an Uncivil World</em> can impact the reader and/or small groups?</p>
<p>            My prayer is that individual Christians as well as small groups will receive the book in the spirit that it is written and that each person will consider its message. I hope that small groups will discuss the issues thoroughly and then resolve to help change the dialogue in their faith community. My greatest hope is that the book with its distinguished list of religious thinkers will help move us toward a dialogue that creates more understanding than heat and disrespect. We will never agree on all the issues that divide us, but we can agree to respect each other as brothers and sisters in Christ with the same Creator.<br />
8. Briefly describe your current ministry.</p>
<p>            I am an active lay member of my church where I serve on the diaconate. I am deeply involved in promoting Say Something Nice Sunday on the first Sunday in June each year and hope to see it adopted by churches and denominations nationwide. I continue to write, speak, and conduct seminars on improving communication. I am currently involved in writing a book tracing my own faith journey. My lifelong mission is to help give voice to those who have no voice.</p>
<p>9. Outside of your ministry, how do you enjoy spending time?</p>
<p>            My wife, Carol, and I enjoy traveling, attending plays and concerts and getting together with friends and family.<img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-72" title="covered bridge" src="http://www.christiancivility.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/covered-bridge-300x225.jpg" alt="covered bridge" width="300" height="225" /></p>
<p>10. What would readers be surprised to know about you?</p>
<p>            Readers might be surprised to know that I have had a passionate interest in politics since going with my dad, who was a precinct worker, to the polls when I was in elementary school. I miss the great orators of the past and am dismayed at our reliance on misleading and inaccurate sound bites.<br />
.</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.christiancivility.com/uncategorized/why-did-you-write-christian-civility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

